The 19th century brought profound transformations to the Ottoman Empire beyond the institutional modernization, constitutional experiments, and intense diplomatic relations with the European states, but also on political, social, and cultural levels. First and Second Serbian Uprisings (1804, 1815), the Greek War of Independence (1821), and the Bulgarian and Albanian nationalist movements severely undermined both the political authority and military control of the Ottoman state in the Balkans. Each uprising was accompanied by territorial losses and concessions made to resolve international crises, triggered significant population movements towards the Eastern boundary of the Balkans.
In the second half of the 19th century, one of the most important political agendas was the institutionalization of migration management, a direct consequence of this prevailing political climate. As discussed in previous sections, the expansionist policies of the 19th-century Russian Empire forcibly moved a portion of communities inhabiting Crimea and the Caucasus to emigrate to the Asia Minor and the Balkans. Uprisings in the Balkans triggered another flow of Muslim populations from the Balkans to Istanbul and Asia Minor.
For many of these populations, Istanbul was not merely a transit point, but the 19th century represented the period when migration within the Ottoman Empire was at its most intense and turbulent. Migration during this century went beyond a demographic issue; it became a human management and an integral part of the political processes evolving toward a nation-state framework.
Until the mid-19th century, migration management in Ottoman territories was primarily the responsibility of local municipal administrations known as şehremaneti. However, particularly following the Crimean War, the movement of hundreds of thousands of migrants from various parts of the empire to Istanbul exceeded the capacity of local authorities, necessitating direct intervention by the central government. Since Istanbul was the empire’s most important hub for both transit and distribution, the establishment of an international commission and a migration bureau directly linked to the centralization efforts of migration management.
The process of centralization brought significant administrative and financial challenges, resulting in extraordinary measures to transport migrants and exceptional expenditures for their housing and sustenance. During this period, it appears that the Istanbul administration sought to alleviate the financial burden of migration on the capital by increasing transportation fares on city lines and raising certain taxes. However, the irregularity and frequent insufficiency of the funds allocated for migration, combined with the overall instability of the fiscal structure, complicated the management of this process.
Moreover, the city’s infrastructure proved inadequate, particularly in response to the large influx of migrants from the Balkans. Housing shortages, inadequate infrastructure, and public health issues emerged, and migrants were often forced to live in temporary shelters. Although the Ottoman administration established bureaucratic mechanisms such as the Muhacirin Commission, it struggled to keep pace with the population increase. Migrants arriving in Istanbul, though not intended to remain for extended periods, faced harsh conditions including housing shortages and disease. The centralization of migration management thus reflects both the administrative challenges and political transformations the Ottoman Empire confronted in the 19th century.
The imperialist competition conducted by industrialized European states in Africa and Asia, while not directly targeting the Ottoman Empire, indirectly affected its capital, Istanbul. At the beginning of a process that would, in the 20th century, evolve into an explicit threat to Ottoman territories in the Aegean and North Africa, Istanbul’s strategic location—at the crossroads of Ottoman lands, routes to Africa, and the Eastern Mediterranean—made it a center for observation, diplomacy, and negotiation among the great powers. During this period, Ottoman leadership with a weakened military capacity, strategically navigated the conflicts of interest among European states without direct confrontation, which, alongside independence uprisings, often forced the empire to manage population displacements.
Following constitutional developments such as the Tanzimat and Islahat Fermans, the Ottoman political history experienced a brief experiment with a constitutional monarchy, which was succeeded in the final quarter of the century by the İstibdat Period—a phase strongly associated with the personality of Sultan Abdulhamid II. During this period, the Parliament (Meclis-i Mebusan) was effectively suspended, with the 1877 Ottoman-Russian War used as justification. The Berlin Treaty of 1878, signed after the 1877–78 war, officially recognized Russia’s role as protector over the Orthodox populations in Ottoman territories. This arrangement created a significant pressure on the Ottoman internal administration and demographic balance, as external interventions and rising nationalist movements in the Balkans increasingly sharpened divisions within the Ottoman subjects.
The Ottoman population was distributed along urban and rural hemispheres and was integrated into the imperial economy in diverse ways. In the first half of the 19th century, the Ottoman administration, operating within the framework of intensive diplomatic relations with European states, sought to implement regulations that guaranteed equality before the law and the assurance of life and property for its subjects. At the same time, the empire attempted to maintain cohesion among its multi-millet population—where “millet” was defined according to religious identity—who occupied key positions within this economic structure, in the face of rising independence movements and nationalist pressures.
As the Muslim population increasingly concentrated in the outskirts of the city, the demographic distribution of Rum Orthodox Christians, Armenians, and Jews also underwent notable transformations during the 19th century. In an Ottoman society where taxation was often organized according to religious affiliation, there existed an urban non-Muslim population alongside the growing Muslim populace. Within the demographic composition of non-Muslims, the Rum Orthodox community stood out, encompassing various Orthodox subgroups. The Armenians played an influential role in the social, cultural, and economic life of Istanbul. Meanwhile, Jewish communities contributed to the city’s dynamic structure particularly in trade and crafts, while Levantines and foreign merchants were concentrated in Galata and Pera.
Muslims migrating from the Balkans to a multi-ethnic Istanbul during the 19th century entered the labor market as small tradesmen, artisans, or service workers, concentrating in districts such as Üsküdar, Eyüp, Aksaray, and Beykoz. They settled both in existing neighborhoods and in newly formed community quarters, maintaining their social and cultural traditions while interacting with other Muslim and non-Muslim communities.
Various Anatolian-origin groups had been settled in the Balkans over preceding centuries following Ottoman conquests, establishing a new demographic order in both urban and rural areas. As a result, the Balkans became not only the empire’s gateway to the West but also a new homeland for populations relocated from Anatolia. With the decline of Ottoman authority under Russian and Austrian influence and the losses caused by 19th-century independence uprisings, the empire experienced a form of “reverse migration.” A significant portion of the founding cadres of the Republic of Turkey hailed from Rumelian origins, shaping the military-bureaucratic elite during the transition from Empire to Republic, and embedding traces of this traumatic experience in the new state’s centralized, security-oriented, and nationalist political culture.
This intense migration brought Istanbul new sources of labor, cultural diversity, and culinary traditions, while simultaneously exposing conflict-inducing issues such as social destabilization and the inadequacy of urban infrastructure. For these reasons, the 19th century stands out in Ottoman political history as a period in which the limits of state authority, governance practices, and ideological cohesion were extensively challenged.
Referances
Erdem, U. (2018). Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e muhacir komisyonları ve faaliyetleri (1860-1923). Ankara: TTK.
Quataert, D. (2006). 19. yüzyıla genel bakış: ıslahatlar devri 1812-1914. Halil İnalcık-Donald Quataert (Eds.), Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun ekonomik ve sosyal tarihi içinde (II, 887-1051. ss.). İstanbul: Eren Yayıncılık.
İpek,N. (1999) Rumeli’den Anadolu’ya Türk Göçleri (1877- 1890), Ankara.
İpek, N. (2006) İmparatorluktan Ulus Devlete Göçler, Serander Yayınları, İstanbul.
Karpat, K. (2010) Osmanlı Nüfusu 1830-1914, Timaş Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İstanbul.
Kutlu, S. (2007) Milliyetçilik ve Emperyalizm Yüzyılında Balkanlar ve Osmanlı
Devleti, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi yay., İstanbul.
İpek, N. (2015). Fetihten Cumhuriyet’e İstanbul’a yönelik göçler. Coşkun Yılmaz (Ed.) Antik Çağ’dan XXI.
Yüzyıla Büyük İstanbul Tarihi içinde (III, 520-530. ss.), İstanbul: İBB Kültür A.Ş.
